On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> HOWEVER, I do believe this is an issue we could live with for 9.0 if >>> it's going to lead to a whole lot of additional debugging of SR. But if >>> it's an easy fix, it'll avoid a lot of complaints on pgsql-general. >> >> I think that the latter statement is right. > > Though we've not reached consensus on smart shutdown during > recovery yet, I wrote the patch that changes its behavior: > shut down the server (including the startup process and the > walreceiver) as soon as all read-only connections have died. > The code is also available in the 'replication' branch in > my git repository. > > And, let's discuss whether something like the attached patch > is required for v9.0 or not.
There is no post about this for over a month. Can I remove this from TODO item of SR for 9.0? Thought? Objection? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers