On 3/4/10 2:47 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> This TODO item really needs to be addressed for 9.0? Frankly I'm not
> familiar with that area, so I've not work on it at all yet, but I'm
> going to create the patch if many people want it for 9.0. What is
> your opinion?

I think it falls under "nice to have, but not essential for 9.0".

--Josh Berkus

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to