Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> 2010/3/6 Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> The analogy I was thinking about was psql -X, but I agree that it's
>> not obvious why this shouldn't be thought of as an additional -f file.
> Uh, I don't follow. When we use -f, we'll run the script and then
> exit. The whole point is to run it and *not* exit, since you are
> normally using it to set up the environment in psql.
If we were going to support multiple -f options, it would be sensible
to interpret "-f -" as "read from stdin until EOF". Then you could
interleave prepared scripts and stdin, which could be pretty handy.
The default behavior would be equivalent to a single instance of "-f -",
and what you are looking for would be "-X -f substitute-psqlrc -f -".
I do think this is potentially cleaner and more general than the
--psqlrc switch. Maybe that should be reverted and the whole topic
reconsidered during 9.1 devel cycle.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
