On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:03:27AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com> writes: > > Here's a patch that: > > 1. adds wording like that to the docs. > > 2. randomises the container package name (a simple and sound security > > measure). > > 3. requires Safe 2.25 (which has assorted fixes, including security). > > 4. removed a harmless but suprious exclamation mark from the source. > > #3 is still an absolute nonstarter, especially for a patch that we'd > wish to backpatch.
This is a patch for 9.0. Backpatching is a separate issue. I think Safe 2.25 should be required, but I'll let whoever applies the patch tweak/delete that hunk as desired. Tim. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
