Greg Stark <gsst...@mit.edu> writes: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> My conclusion is that this is probably a compiler bug.
> Could be this: > http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6750087 Hmmm ... that doesn't seem to be quite an exact match, because the setting and testing of the bitfield is in different functions in different files in our case. Still, it seems related. It would be useful to verify whether these two buildfarm animals are fully up-to-date on compiler patches. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
