Robert Haas wrote:
This seems pretty reasonable to me, especially considering that JDBC
is apparently already doing it. I suppose there will always be
projects that want to reimplement the backend protocol so that they
can be "pure" some-language, but chipping away at the list of other
reasons why someone might not want to use libpq still seems like a
good idea.
...Robert
Hello Robert,
Thank you for your support, but am unsure if it is wise to put time in
it due to the other reactions.
regards,
Yeb Havinga
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
