On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>>>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would >>>>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of >>>>> checking that. >>>> >>>> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple enough. >> >>> That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great >>> answer. >> >> Who complained about that exactly? It seems like a perfectly >> appropriate answer to me. > > Jaime Casanova. >
i'm just finishing to read an 347 rows EXPLAIN ANALYZE, so yes i prefer a DEBUG message than to hunt missing rels -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
