2010/3/30 Tom Lane <[email protected]>: > Ian Barwick <[email protected]> writes: >> 2010/3/30 Pavel Stehule <[email protected]>: >>> we can use a non existing column "name". What does mean? > >> FYI this has caused me (and presumably a few other people) a bit of >> head-scratching, e.g.: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-03/msg00362.php > > We could make that stop happening if we were willing to restrict the > cases in which an I/O conversion would be applied, but I think the cure > might be worse than the disease. It would be an entirely arbitrary > restriction of a feature. >
it is confusing :(. It returns some data, but it have to returns syntax error. Regards Pavel Stehule > regards, tom lane > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
