On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's probably also easy to fix so that it doesn't NEED to be documented. > > The thing is, when dealing with new features, we reduce our overall > maintenance burden if we get it right the first time. Obviously it's > too late for major changes, but minor adjustments to maintain the POLA > seem like exactly what we SHOULD be doing right now.
The attached patch implements the Heikki's proposal: ---------- ReservedBackends = superuser_reserved_connections + max_wal_senders MaxBackends = max_connections + autovacuum_max_workers + max_wal_senders + 1 ---------- This change looks like minor adjustments rather than major changes. I have one question: In the patch, max_wal_senders is ignored by CheckRequiredParameterValues() as autovacuum_max_workers is already. Is this OK for HS? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
replication_connections_v1.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
