Jaime Casanova <[email protected]> writes: > then, something is wrong because \ddp+ should be giving an error > (because that command doesn't exist and \dd seems to be accepting the > p+ as a parameter)
No, it's just ignoring the p+, not treating it as a parameter. I agree
this is bogus --- patch committed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
