On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> writes: >> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Not sure if this is good enough or we need to provide some more-obvious >>> way of dealing with it. > >> it's strange that a REVOKE doesn't clean what a GRANT did, and DROP >> OWNED BY seems very dangerous (at least if i forgot to make REASSIGN >> OWNED first). > > Agreed --- I fixed it so that granting or revoking back to the default > permissions set will remove the entry. >
ah! now is working nice... thanks -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL AsesorÃa y desarrollo de sistemas Guayaquil - Ecuador Cel. +59387171157 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
