On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasa...@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Not sure if this is good enough or we need to provide some more-obvious
>>> way of dealing with it.
>
>> it's strange that a REVOKE doesn't clean what a GRANT did, and DROP
>> OWNED BY seems very dangerous (at least if i forgot to make REASSIGN
>> OWNED first).
>
> Agreed --- I fixed it so that granting or revoking back to the default
> permissions set will remove the entry.
>

ah! now is working nice... thanks

-- 
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to