On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 18:03 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > I'm leaning toward postponing the item to v9.1 or later.
If you want to defer anything, then I'd like to get a summary of what you are thinking of deferring and why that is acceptable. Right now there are lots of unfinished items and no movement on them. Yes, I'm unhappy about that. My feeling is that we should only default on "port" as part of the primary_conninfo. All other settings are required or we should reject streaming. Replication connections should be explicit. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
