On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 13:54, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If it does, there should be >>> some way to get PGXS to execute that rule as well, I'm sure. >> >> If we can copy/link the source file defining "new PQexec" when >> we compile the dblink, DLL doesn't seem to be required. So I >> stop creating new DLL for PGXS. > > On second thought, ISTM that we cannot use any source files which exist > in places other than contrib/dblink and installation directory when we > compile dblink under USE_PGXS=1. But we can put the file implementing > new PQexec on those neither. So I'm thinking again that it should be > provided as the shared library and be linked from walreceiver and dblink. > Is this right? > > If adding new shared library is too big change at this point, I think > that we should postpone the fix only for dblink to 9.1 or later. Since > no one has complained about this long-term problem of dblink, I'm not > sure it really should be fixed right now. Thought?
+1. Let's fix walreceiver for now, and we can revisit dblink later. Since we haven't had any complaints so far... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
