Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The seed alone wouldn't be enough to duplicate the behavior, since > the behavior of random() typically varies across platforms. So we > might get a report and still be unable to reproduce it. At least the person getting the initial failure would be able to recreate it, and possibly provide a stack trace. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
