Kevin Grittner wrote: > Koichi Suzuki <[email protected]> wrote: > > 2010/4/14 Simon Riggs <[email protected]>: > > >> It would be a very useful test case to publish. > > > I'm still struggling to generate remaing WAL records. > > Sure, but when you've got it all, please share. I'd like to see us > have a much larger set of tests than the "make check" regression > tests which would get run less frequently but test a lot more. This > sounds like a good one to include.
Agreed. This test belongs in our CVS tree so we can maintain it as we add new WAL types. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
