On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 17:44 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > I will change the error message. > > I gave a good deal of thought to trying to figure out a cleaner > solution to this problem than just changing the error message and > failed. So let's change the error message. Of course I'm not quite > sure what we should change it TO, given that the situation is the > result of an interaction between three different GUCs and we have no > way to distinguish which one(s) are the problem.
"You need all three" covers it. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
