On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 15:09 +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > I did some testing of this patch (v2). Unfortunately I don't have access > to hardware capable of doing tests at the same scale as Erik used. > However I was still able to show a consistent difference (I think) > between standby performance with and without the patch applied.
... > Overall looks like the patch gets standby read only performance close to > the master - at least in the case where there are minimal master > transactions being tracked by the standby (I had to leave the master > idle whilst running the standby case, as they shared the machine). Hope > this info is useful. Thanks very much for the report; always good to get confirmation. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
