On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > One reason I believe this isn't so critical as all that is that it only > matters for cases where the operation on the master took an exclusive > lock.
Uhm, or a vacuum ran. Or a HOT page cleanup occurred, or a btree page split deleted old tuples. -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
