On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3.14...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This isn't exactly a bug, but it could be considered unintuitive
> behavior.  Consider this:

by unintuitive you mean: 'explicitly defined in the SQL standard' :-).
 I happen to agree with you but that's irrelevant.  If you absolutely
require this use the composite type workaround.

merlin

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to