Simon Riggs wrote: > With a plugin option, I would not object to option 1. > > If option 1 was taken, without plugins, it's clear that would be against > consensus. > > Having said that, I'll confirm now there will not be an extreme reaction > from me if option (1) was forced, nor do I counsel that from others.
I found this email amusing. You phrase it like the community is supposed to be worried by an objection from you or an "extreme reaction"; I certainly am not. You have been in the community long enough to not use such phrasing. This is not the first time I have complained about this. I have no idea why an objection from you should mean more than an objection from anyone else in the community, and I have no idea what an "extreme reaction" means, or why anyone should care. Do you think the community is negotiting with you? I think the concensus is to change this setting to a boolean. If you don't want to do it, I am sure we can find someone who will. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
