On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 16:10 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote: > Adding pause/resume seems to introduce some non-trivial locking > problems, though. How would you handle a pause request if the recovery > process currently held a lock?
(We are only talking about AccessExclusiveLocks here. No LWlocks are held across WAL records during replay) Just pause. There are no technical problem there. Perhaps a danger of unforeseen consequences, though doing that might also be desirable, who can say? -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
