* Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> [100510 06:03]: > A problem with using the name "max_standby_delay" for Tom's suggestion > is that it sounds like a hard limit, which it isn't. But if we name it > something like:
I'ld still rather an "if your killing something, make sure you kill enough to get all the way current" behaviour, but that's just me.... I'm want to run my standbys in a always current mode... But if I decide to play with a lagged HR, I really want to make sure there is some mechanism to cap the lag, and the "cap" is something I can understand and use to make a reasonable estimate as to when data I know is live on the primary will be seen on the standby... bonus points if it works similarly for archive recovery ;-) a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, ai...@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
