On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org>wrote:
> On a quick look, I didn't like the way you separated the > "pg_database_encoding_max_length() > 1" cases. There seem to be too > much common code. Can that be refactored a bit better? > I did a little refactoring in order to avoid some similar code. I'm not quite sure about my CHAR_CMP macro. Is it a good idea?
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers