Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicolas Bazin wrote:
> Here is the description:
>
> When a macro is replaced by the preprocessor, pgc.l reaches a end of file, which is
>not the actual end of the file. One side effect of that is that if you are in a ifdef
>block, you get a wrong error telling you that a endif is missing.
>
> This patch corrects pgc.l and also adds a test of this problem to test1.pgc. To
>convince you apply the patch to test1.pgc first then try to compile the test then
>apply the patch to pgc.l.
>
> The patch moves the test of the scope of an ifdef block to the end of the file
>beeing parsed, including all includes files, ... .
>
> For the record, this patch was applied a first time by bruce then overwritten by
>Micheal and reapplied by him. But the big mystery is that there is no trace of that
>in CVS ????
>
> Nicolas
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
