On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 21:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > I have what I believe is > an equivalent but simpler implementation, which is attached.
There's no code comments to explain this, so without in-depth analysis of the problem, Masao's patch and this one its not possible to say anything. Please explain in detail why its the right approach and put that in a comment, so we'll understand now and in the future. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
