On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> Objections to commit? > > This is not the time to be hacking stuff like this. You haven't even > demonstrated that there's a significant performance issue here.
I tend to agree that this point of the cycle isn't a good one to be making changes, but your performance statement confuses me. If a fairly small patch means we can avoid un-necessary reads why shouldn't we avoid them? -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect j...@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
