Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 24 17:18:21 -0400 2010: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > wrote: > > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010:
> > Uh, how does this work when you change the entries for shared relations > > in a database-specific pg_class? Keeping everything in sync seems hard, > > if not impossible. > > Well, I might be missing something here, but pg_class already IS > database-specific. If you change anything very significant about a > shared rel in one copy of pg_class today, you're toast, IIUC. This > proposal doesn't make that any better, but I don't think it makes it > any worse either. I thought the whole point of this exercise was precisely to avoid this sort of problem. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
