Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- I/Alex (Mon, 24 May 2010 12:25:18 -0400) ----*
| No equivalent of FETCH_COUNT is available at the libpq level, so I
| assume that the interface I am using is smart enough not to send
| gigabytes of data to FE.
|
| Where does the result set (GBs of data) reside after I call
| PQexecPrepared? On BE, I hope?
Sorry for asking again...
No sarcasm meant: is there no straightforward answer here? Or nobody
is certain? Or a wrong list?
The straighforward answer is that the libpq frontend c-library does not
support something like the JDBC client's setFetchSize.
The GBs of data are gathered at the site of the libpq client (pgresult
object gathered/allocated while consuming result input from backend).
regards,
Yeb Havinga
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
