On May 26, 2010, at 4:09 PM, alvherre wrote: > The problem with the => operator seems best resolved as not accepting > such an operator in a function parameter, which sucks but we don't seem > to have a choice. Perhaps we could allow "=>" to resolve as the > operator for the case the user really needs to use it; or a > schema-qualified operator.
I think requiring schema-qualification is an acceptable compromise. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
