Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Yes, but if we are going to have to honor "=>" eventually, shouldn't we > > just do it now? Supporting := and => seems confusing. > > Personally, I haven't accepted the "if" part of that, therefore I > feel no need to argue over the "then".
Right, I am asking about the "if" part. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
