Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > MSSQL? Are you sure? This is the example posted in this thread:
> >
> > EXEC dbo.GetItemPrice @ItemCode = 'GXKP', @PriceLevel = 5
> >
> > and it more matches our := syntax than => in its argument ordering.
> >
>
> I think you are seriously confused, or else you are seriously confusing
> me. The => proposal is to have the ordering "param_name =>
> passed_value", just as Oracle has, just as MSSQL has "@param_name =
> passed_value", and just as the := proposal would have "param_name :=
> passed_value".
You are right; I am seriously confused. I thought it was value =>
variable. I was wrong.
I now see the Oracle syntax matches the Perl hash assignment syntax.
The "=>" operator is helpful in documenting the
correspondence between keys and values in hashes, and
other paired elements in lists.
%hash = ( $key => $value );
login( $username => $password );
--
Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ None of us is going to be here forever. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
