Tom Lane wrote:
Why don't we improve the code, instead? In particular make
libpqrcv_connect() do
- snprintf(conninfo_repl, sizeof(conninfo_repl), "%s replication=true",
conninfo);
+ snprintf(conninfo_repl, sizeof(conninfo_repl), "%s database=replication
replication=true", conninfo);
I don't think it's unlikely that someone would try to enter a
replication-specific password into ~/.pgpass.
+1. It's highly likely - that's how we got here in the first place. It
seems to me like a perfectly reasonable thing to do.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
