Tom Lane wrote:
> Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there some problem implement "SET ... ON ROLLBACK UNSET" ?
>
> Yes. See my previous example concerning search_path: that variable
> MUST be rolled back at transaction abort, else we risk its value being
> invalid. We cannot offer the user a choice.
Not really on topic, but I was wondering how you ensure that
you correct the search path in case someone drops the schema?
Is an invalid search path really that critical (read security
issue)?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
