On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: ... > Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. ... > A lack of bugs usually indicates there are no bugs in the areas being > tested.
Would the real Simon Riggs please speak up? Isn't that precisely what "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" is meant to refute? -- greg -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
