Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I believe that the comment code is probably right, because I think
>> IConst can only handle values < 2^31, whereas OIDs can be as large as
>> 2^32-1.
> I investigated this a little more and the above analysis turns out to
> be correct. ALTER LARGE OBJECT OWNER and GRANT ... ON LARGE OBJECT
> don't work for large objects outside the range of a signed integer.
Yup.
> Session demonstrating the problem and proposed patch attached.
This patch seems extremely grotty, though. Surely that's not the way we
were doing it in the comment code?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
