On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 12:39 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > I tend to consider it a bug that there's no known way under windows to > use the same trick as under Unix by using '/usr/bin/true' as your > archive command. And this Unix trick itself does feel like a hack. > > Also I'd very much like to be able to recommend (even if not change the > official defaults) to setup wal_level to archive, archive_mode=on and > archive_command=pg_archive_bypass, so that the day you have a HA budget > ain't the day you're going to restart the server to enable the fault > tolerance settings⦠> > So please find attached a very simple "let's see about it" patch to > implement an internal archive_command that just returns true and is > called pg_archive_bypass. It's missing documentation, which I'll provide > if needed (meaning there's some will to consider applying such a patch).
ISTM like a good idea to have a couple of more obvious commands provided purely as "internal commands". If we do this on restore_command as well, we can skip pg_archivecleanup completely, for example. So, not for 9.0. But I like concept for 9.1. Would need to be coded as some kind of escape phrase, followed by other command. So not just a quick hack with this one exception. Something like archive_command = 'pg_archive_internal:true' Wouldn't rush to another patch though, needs agreement first. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers