On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> Put me down for +>. > > Since there are no other votes for that option (or, indeed, any other > option), I'm going to go with my original instinct and change hstore > => text[] to hstore & text[]. Patch to do that is attached.
Damn. My other argument is that & looks like boolean or bitwise AND, so the return of an hstore might be unexpected. +> looks more like an arrow (sort of). But it doesn't much matter, as long as it works. Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
