On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> We should make trace_recovery_messages available only when >> the WAL_DEBUG macro was defined? > > No, because it's used in a lot of other contexts besides that. > >> Currently it's always >> available, so the standby seems to call elog() too frequently. > > Where? I don't see very many messages that would actually get emitted > at the default setting of the parameter.
Yes. I was just concerned that frequent calls themselves may increase the overhead. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
