Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Let's discuss what the best possible user interface for the information
> would be first, and then decide if we need/want to force an initdb for
> that. We have pg_upgrade now, that makes initdb less painful, and if
> it's just a new view it might be possible to just add a note in the
> release notes that you'll have to run the CREATE VIEW manually if upgrading.
The view would presumably depend on a C-language SRF, which isn't there
either.
I'm of the opinion that this is a 9.1 problem. It needs more thought
than we can put into it now --- one obvious question is what about
monitoring on the slave side? Another is who should be able to see the
data?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
