Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > Sorry to be commenting late, but don't most people want to add to the > > end or beginning of the enum list, rather than in the middle, and can't > > we support that already? > > We could allow adding a value, but we couldn't guarantee where it would > appear in the type's sort ordering. Depending on the current OID > counter it would usually show up either at the end or the beginning. > I think the general feeling is that this is too implementation-dependent > to be acceptable.
Well, we don't need the enum value to map into the entire oid range. Can't we just add one to the top-most value and see if there is a conflict? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + None of us is going to be here forever. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
