I wrote: > When preparing to deal with a new statement: > - acquire lockX > - if not a superuser > - and not in an active transaction > - and countX >= max_active_transactions > - place current process at tail of waitX queue, and block > - (lockX would be released while blocked) > - increment countX > - release lockX There's a bug there already. This should be better: - if not in an active transaction - acquire lockX - if not a superuser - and countX >= max_active_transactions - place current process at tail of waitX queue, and block - (lockX would be released while blocked) - increment countX - release lockX -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
