Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm dubious that it's worth the trouble. I suggest that it might be >> best to replace these usages of L'\0' by plain scalar 0. Does anyone >> think that wouldn't work or is too grotty?
> or maybe 0x0000, which I gather from > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_character> is the usual locution. Hm. I don't really read that page as suggesting that 0x0000 is what to use if your compiler hasn't got wide chars. I'd tend to go with just 0, which is a reasonably common substitute for non-wide '\0' ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
