Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > So, clang 2.7 didn't fix it. Do we want to proceed with my patch or > leave clang unsupported?
Given that the patch breaks plperl, I'd vote no ... but in any case
right now is not the time to be applying it. Maybe it would be useful
to put it in HEAD after we branch 9.0.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
