On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:53:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes:
> > By the way, "make check" fails here with attached initdb.log:
> 
> > creating system views ... FATAL:  unrecognized token: "false"
> 
> Hm, I'd suspect something fouled up in keyword recognition.  Did you
> do a "make clean" and rebuild?

I did make maintainer-clean.

> BTW, this patch is still a few bricks shy of a load, since there's
> no kwlist.h change and so the new MERGE keyword couldn't possibly be
> recognized.  More generally, I'm wondering why the original .rar
> submission was 300k (presumably compressed) and your diff is only
> about 35k ...

I'll look into that.  From what you can see, is it worth trying to
clean up, starting from base, or should we just wait for the next
revision of the patch?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to