On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:11:41 -0400 Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> We have a clear idea of what should be part of the public history > contained in the authoritative repo and what should be history that is > private to the developer/tester/committer. We don't want to pollute the > former with the latter. The thought makes me shudder...you lose the history, the reasons for specific changes, the authorship of changes, and the ability of your testers to pinpoint problematic changes. But...your project, your decision...we'll keep using PostgreSQL regardless...:) Thanks, jon -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
