Excerpts from Alexander Korotkov's message of jue jul 22 03:21:57 -0400 2010: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Ah, I see. That's pretty compelling, I guess. Although it still > > seems like a lot of code... > > > I think there is a way to merge single-byte and multi-byte versions of > functions without loss in performance using macros and includes (like in > 'backend/utils/adt/like.c'). Do you think it is acceptable in this case?
Using the trick of a single source file similar to like_match.c that implements all the different behaviors, and include that file more than once with different macro definitions, is probably a good idea. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
