Excerpts from Marko Tiikkaja's message of vie jul 23 17:44:21 -0400 2010: > On 7/24/10 12:37 AM +0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Excerpts from Marko Tiikkaja's message of vie jul 23 14:13:18 -0400 2010:
> > I don't think it's fair game to change the behavior of multiple-output > > rules at this point. However, I also think that it's unwise to base > > wCTEs on the behavior of rules -- rules are widely considered broken and > > unusable for nontrivial cases. > > I don't want to change the behaviour either, but we have two different > behaviours right now. We need to change at least the other. It seems like it's EXPLAIN ANALYZE that needs fixing. > wCTEs are not going to be based on any of the broken behaviour of rules, > that's for sure. What I meant is expanding a single query into multiple > queries and running the executor separately for all of them. Is a wCTE going to be expanded into multiple queries? If not, it sounds like we're all agreed. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
