Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Curious -- I was previously using ~1 week old sources, and I was
> > unable to reproduce the problem (using either the original
> > test-case or the one provided above: neither has any problems).
> > When I built the current CVS code, both test-case exhibits the
> > problem quite obviously. Therefore, it seems that the problem
> > has been introduced recently.
>
> [ scratches head ... ] I think most of the major recent changes
> have been schema related, so this is quite likely my fault. Let
> me know if you need help debugging it.
Tom, did you see his patch posted a few hours ago. Did that fix it? I
can apply.
>
> > P.S. Tom, would you mind adding my IP to your spam whitelist?
> > Your spam-blocking software rejects my emails.
>
> 24.102.202.* whitelisted; let me know if that's not the correct
> IP range for you. (Although you might think I'm blocking most
> of the net, I still get a depressingly large amount of spam ---
> and that's not even counting the Klez virus that seems to be
> deliberately targeting my jpeg-info alter ego ... grumble ...)
Have you read my spam blocking article and tools:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/spam
It blocks ~70-80% with no false blocks.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
