Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Having seen zero reports of any numeric > > failures since we installed it, and seeing it takes >10x times longer > > than the other tests, I think it should be paired back. Do we really > > need 10 tests of each complex function? I think one would do the trick. > > A good point tho, I didn't submit a regression test that tries to ALTER 3 > different non-existent tables to check for failures - one test was enough...
That was my point. Is there much value in testing each function ten times. Anyway, seems only I care so I will drop it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
