On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> but i have a few questions, maybe is right what you did i only want to
>> understand it:
>> - you added this in include/storage/smgr.h, so why is safe to assume
>> that if the backend != InvalidBackendId it must be a temp relation?
>>
>> +#define SmgrIsTemp(smgr) \
>> +   ((smgr)->smgr_rnode.backend != InvalidBackendId)
>
> That's pretty much the whole point of the patch.  Instead of
> identifying relations as simply "temporary" or "not temporary", we
> identify as "a temporary relation owned by backend X" or as "not
> temporary".
>

Ok, this one seems good enough... i'm marking it as "ready for committer"

-- 
Jaime Casanova         www.2ndQuadrant.com
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to